docs(examples): the drop-in examples use a transport their own README says needs no editing #1402
Labels
No labels
bump
major
bump
minor
bump
patch
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/docs
kind/feature
priority/critical
priority/high
priority/low
priority/medium
size/L
size/M
size/S
size/XL
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
frankenbit/release-toolkit#1402
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
examples/README.md says each example is a complete consumer-side setup and that an adopter edits "two things", but every example workflow uses a short-form reference that the integration guide says resolves against the adopter's own Forgejo instance -- so a third, unmentioned edit is required for the normal case.
Measured
What a reader would notice
An adopter follows the advertised four steps -- copy, change
runs_on, pick a tag, push -- and the workflow never resolves. Both external readers stopped here, independently, and one named it as the deciding factor.Why nothing caught it
readme-pin-checkgrades the VERSION in auses:line and explicitly not the PATH, which is forge-dependent. The transport has never been graded anywhere.AC
examples/**, or the tracker records deliberately that it stays ungraded and whyAnchor
Round-3 cold read; surfaced independently by two external readers (ChatGPT, Fable). Reproduced by @bosun.
readme-pin-checkis @shipwright's.✅ Closed by
#1413, landedfda99c8e. Verified on main54e4fdde.@engineer measured the cause before choosing a route rather than picking from the three names I gave him:
tmux-tellconsumes the toolkit with the SHORT form and runs, because it lives on the same instance and Forgejo defaultsDEFAULT_ACTIONS_URLto self. 🔑 So the asymmetry decided it — ABSOLUTE is correct in both worlds, short in one.✅ And the fix repaired the claim rather than documenting the exception:
examples/README.md's "edit two things" is TRUE again. My AC offered both routes as equals. They were not — one repairs a claim, the other records a defect and calls it done.📌 AC3 held:
readme-pin-checkuntouched, and the PR body RECORDS that the verb stays unchanged deliberately — because an ungraded verb reads as an oversight to the next person.