chore(release): v0.54.0 #1006
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bump
major
bump
minor
bump
patch
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/docs
kind/feature
priority/critical
priority/high
priority/low
priority/medium
size/L
size/M
size/S
size/XL
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
frankenbit/release-toolkit!1006
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "release-prep/rolling"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Changelog density — clean
Advisory mirror of the cut-time gate, computed when this description was written. It carries no authority: the cut re-runs these checks against the section as it stands then, and this branch is recreated from
mainon every compose.Added
#811).Changed
Fixed
Intended-targets:trailer: the refusal now names the anchoring problem instead of repeating itself (#1008).Removed
None.
Deprecated
None.
Upgrade
None.
4fc1b0a5800ed09360430ed0936043221250b30f221250b30f229fcaf09d229fcaf09d4dbe3b01504dbe3b01502a0dbbcc4a2a0dbbcc4ae2a8e02316e2a8e023160394420fda0394420fdac591e15432c591e154321e0e14f0ce1e0e14f0cee0e229f79ce0e229f79c3960ecc5e6APPROVE — reviewed at
3960ecc5. A correct cut; two cosmetic notes, neither blocking.Verified
Every consumed fragment reached the changelog, and the kinds match. 11 fragments deleted, 11 entries added, and each entry's section matches its filename suffix:
Version bump is consistent across every surface:
VERSION0.53.1 → 0.54.0, the sevenreusable-*.ymlpins,BUILD_BAKED_TOOLKIT_REFin all seven, both example projects,README.md,docs/integration.md. No surface left on 0.53.1 — I checked by diffing the pin lines rather than by spot-check.CI is green on this head, read newest-row-per-context: 25 contexts, all
success, covering all 12 required. (Read from.statuson each row —.stateis null per-row and exists only on the combined object.)Should consider — two of eleven entries render a colour swatch
Nine entries write the issue reference bare, two wrap it in backticks:
Forgejo parses
#NNNinside a code span as a CSS colour and injects a preview swatch. Measured against this instance, with a bare-form control in the same sentence shape:So the published changelog and the release notes will show a small coloured square beside those two references and not the other nine. Dropping the backticks makes all eleven render alike.
Nit in passing: trailing periods are inconsistent too —
#811,#498and#1008end with., the other eight do not. Same two entries, so one pass fixes both.Disclosure — a finding I withdrew
I initially read the
Fixedorder (1008before611) as a lexical filename sort that 4-digit issue numbers had newly broken,#1008being the first of those. Refuted before I wrote it up: entries in historical sections are not ordered by issue number in either direction —v0.50.0runs 962, 941, 843, 931, 933, 697, … So there is no ordering convention here to violate, and the position of#1008is not a regression.Question, not a finding
BUILD_BAKED_TOOLKIT_REFmoves'main'→'v0.54.0'in all seven reusables, which matches the in-line comment (auto-updated by rt prep / rt repin). What I could not see from the diff is the return trip:maincurrently holds'main', so something resets it after a cut. Assuming that isreusable-release.yml's post-merge push and not something a reviewer needs to check — flagging only so the assumption is on the record rather than in my head.