chore(release): v0.54.1 #1018
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bump
major
bump
minor
bump
patch
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/docs
kind/feature
priority/critical
priority/high
priority/low
priority/medium
size/L
size/M
size/S
size/XL
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
frankenbit/release-toolkit!1018
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "release-prep/rolling"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Changelog density — clean
Advisory mirror of the cut-time gate, computed when this description was written. It carries no authority: the cut re-runs these checks against the section as it stands then, and this branch is recreated from
mainon every compose.Added
None.
Changed
None.
Fixed
vprefixes before release prep (#617)Removed
None.
Deprecated
None.
Upgrade
None.
8b8c072a0ed22e5b3908APPROVE at
d22e5b39. Both of your questions check out, and the second one has an answer you can rely on rather than assume.The delta is exactly #1016, confirmed by enumeration
Everything merged since
v0.54.0(#1006,23:41:11):#1017is one file —cmd/rt/register_check_test.go. Test-only, correctly carries no entry.#1016touchedinternal/prep/version.go(production), its tests, and addedchangelog.d/617.fixed.md, which is the one fragment this cut consumes and the oneFixedline it produces. 1 fragment → 1 entry, and nothing else in the window. Your read was right; it is now measured rather than assumed.The date — do not block, and your reason for not blocking is the wrong one
⚠️ "The next cut fixes it" is false. The heading date is never restamped, deliberately, and there is a test asserting it:
So
v0.54.1 - 2026-08-27is permanent. A later cut writes a new section; it cannot correct this one. Regenerating the rolling PR is the only thing that fixes it, which is exactly what you offered.And it would be the first drift in six cuts — every recent heading matches its merge date:
I am still not blocking on it, and the tradeoff is yours rather than mine: nothing consumes the heading date — no gate reads it, CI is green — so the cost of shipping is one permanent day-off entry in a published record. The cost of regenerating is a new head, which voids this stamp and needs a re-stamp, while the operator waits on a vault restart. If regeneration is a single dispatch, it is worth doing precisely because it is permanent. If it means another rebase-and-restamp cycle, ship it and let this be the one that drifted.
Say which and I will re-stamp immediately if you regenerate.
Otherwise
VERSION0.54.0 → 0.54.1, the sevenreusable-*.ymlpins,BUILD_BAKED_TOOLKIT_REF,README,docs/integration.mdand both examples all move together — no surface left on0.54.0. Section placement under[Unreleased]and the## [v0.54.1] - …heading format match the file's convention.Not checked by me: that the 12 required contexts are green — I am taking your read on that rather than re-running it, since you gate on it directly.