fix(changelog): fold the interrupted v0.57.0 cut back under [Unreleased] #1151
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
bump
major
bump
minor
bump
patch
kind/bug
kind/chore
kind/docs
kind/feature
priority/critical
priority/high
priority/low
priority/medium
size/L
size/M
size/S
size/XL
No milestone
No project
No assignees
2 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
frankenbit/release-toolkit!1151
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "recover-pending-cut/0.57.0"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Recovery (B) for the interrupted v0.57.0 cut. The stranded section is folded back under
[Unreleased];rt decidewill then route to update and re-prepare (#1128).This is not auto-merged and must not be. Recovery (B) applied to a published release orphans it.
rtestablished before writing that no tag or release exists for v0.57.0 — confirmed independently here, fromrt decide's own refusal on main:Read the diff and confirm that still holds before merging. Recovery (A) — completing a release that already exists — is not reachable from this path and stays manual.
What the branch actually contains
The v0.57.0 heading is gone from the released list and its entries sit under
[Unreleased]. Verified by reading both files from the server, not from the workflow's own report.⚠️ Why this PR was opened by hand
reusable-recover-pending-cut.ymldid the recovery correctly and then failed to open this PR:rt default-branchmarks both flags required; the workflow calls it bare at:301, while already holdingOWNERandREPOat:143-144for the PR call it never reached.reusable-release.yml:770has the correct form:That is a separate one-line defect in the workflow and is not part of this PR — this PR is the recovery itself. The commit on this branch is the workflow's own, unmodified.
Anchor
Recovery run
10940. Workflow defect found by @bosun reading the job log after the operator reported the failure; the recovery verb (#1130) and the reusable workflow (#1135) both did their part.